Soft yes culture
Teams build on vibe. FUND forces a structured evaluation before spend.
Products · Module
PE evaluate, FUND / PASS / DIG, then build and publish. The verdict math is a calibration-tracked Bayesian and Monte Carlo scoring pipeline, not a static rubric, now being wired into every verdict.
Proof beats promises
portfolio.nltlabs.ai ↗Every claim routes to a live URL, not a slide.
Teams build on vibe. FUND forces a structured evaluation before spend.
Engine pairs the verdict with workflows that publish proof.
Roles, risk tiers, and pipelines are catalogued, not tribal knowledge.
FUND, PASS, or DIG. Explicit before build spend.
A hard gate only pays off when stakeholders get a clickable URL.
Structured PE gate over Scout (or your) intake.
FUND, PASS, or DIG, backed by a Bayesian posterior on sector base rates and a 10,000-sample Monte Carlo pass on revenue and bankruptcy risk (built and tested, being wired into every verdict). Explicit, not a vibe.
POC and MVP workflows land on the portfolio.
Outward copy uses FUND only. It is the Engine schema for proceed-to-build, never a funding commitment from a landing page.
Yes, if you already produce PE-ready intake. Most buyers take the Suite so the front door and the gate stay aligned.
A Bayesian posterior against sector base rates, a 10,000-sample Monte Carlo pass on revenue and bankruptcy risk, tornado and Sobol sensitivity analysis, and an anti-fabrication filter on every claim, tracked against real outcomes with Brier score and Expected Calibration Error. Built and tested as a standalone pipeline; wiring it into every live verdict is in progress.
No. FundDecision construction runs a second, independent gate: a vertical allow-list veto blocks any FUND verdict outside the Phase 1 allow-list before it becomes a live decision record — two gates, not one.
One conversation. Honest fit. We'll tell you if this isn't the right path.